#1405 includes some changes to pins.h for a 4th extruder. This commit
applies those changes. It also deals with a possible problem with
SENSITIVE_PINS.
Small changes (and formatting to confuse the diff’er) which first
allows DOGLCD and LCD_PROGRESS_BAR to be enabled in tandem, then a
#warning (rather than error) that the extra progress bar / message
options don’t apply to graphical displays at this time. This leaves
open perhaps combining the progress bar and message area in some future
(or forked custom) graphical LCD display arrangement (at which time the
relevant variables may be moved into ultralcd.cpp with externs in
ultralcd.h). I also added a conditional error that the progress bar and
the filament display may not work well together.
This is the optimal code for a self-contained formatter, although the
original code is crafty in being smaller and simpler, and can be
evaluated as using the original output as a scratch pad for state,
making the final formatter more straightforward. While this code is
longer, all code-paths are minimal.
This is the optimal code for a self-contained formatter, although the
original code is crafty in being smaller and simpler, and can be
evaluated as using the original output as a scratch pad for state,
making the final formatter more straightforward. While this code is
longer, all code-paths are minimal.
This is the optimal code for a self-contained formatter, although the
original code is crafty in being smaller and simpler, and can be
evaluated as using the original output as a scratch pad for state,
making the final formatter more straightforward. While this code is
longer, all code-paths are minimal.
This is the optimal code for a self-contained formatter, although the
original code is crafty in being smaller and simpler, and can be
evaluated as using the original output as a scratch pad for state,
making the final formatter more straightforward. While this code is
longer, all code-paths are minimal.
For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.
For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.
For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.
# The first commit's message is:
SD Card Alpha Sorting
First iteration of alphabetical sorting for SD cards, both
slow+efficient and fast+rammy. Option for folders to sort first, last,
or not at all.
# This is the 2nd commit message:
Expand on More RAM concept, address minor bugs
# This is the 3rd commit message:
Improvements, more SORT_USES_MORE_RAM
With this option, always keeps the dir in RAM, doubling as a cache for
getfilename. A board with only 8K of SRAM is cutting it very close.
# This is the 4th commit message:
Completed SORT_USES_MORE_RAM implementation
For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.
For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.
For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.
Scott Lahteine